[pubmed] Efficacy and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis treatment of myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 2983
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
3
Zodiaque :
Âge : 20
Contact :
    Windows 10 Chrome

[pubmed] Efficacy and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis treatment of myasthenia gravis: A systematic review and

Message par RSS-Bot »


Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 30;100(17):e25622. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025622.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) on DFPP for MG from database establishment to June 2019. Two researchers independently screened the articles, extracted the data, and cross checked the results. RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS: Seven RCTs and 2 CCTs were found comprising 329 patients. The results showed that clinical MG remission rate after DFPP treatment was significantly higher (OR = 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.97-9.53; P < .001) and the serum levels of antititin antibody was significantly decreased (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 9.30; 95% CI, 7.51-11.08; P < .001). In addition, the quantitative MG (QMG) score, hospital stay and time to remission of MG symptoms, and acetylcholine receptor antibody (AchRAb) decreased in the DFPP treatment group; however, these outcomes had high heterogeneity among the studies. Only one study has reported on the adverse effects, including hypotension and hematoma.

CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that DFPP can be recommended for the short-term mitigation of MG. Because our review was limited by the quantity and quality of the included studies, the above conclusions should be verified by additional high-quality studies.

PMID:33907116 | DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000025622


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3390711 ... 4&v=2.14.4
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur association.amis-modo@myasthenie.com


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »