[Pubmed] Treatment patterns, intensive treatment, and hospitalization-related burden of juvenile generalized myasthenia

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6500
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Windows 10 Chrome

[Pubmed] Treatment patterns, intensive treatment, and hospitalization-related burden of juvenile generalized myasthenia

Message par RSS-Bot »


Front Neurol. 2026 Sep 15;17:1877931. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1877931. eCollection 2026.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Juvenile generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) management aims to control symptoms while minimizing corticosteroid-related toxicity. However, large-scale evidence on real-world pediatric treatment patterns remains limited.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a large Japanese hospital-based claims database (Medical Data Vision). We identified patients aged 0-17 years with juvenile generalized MG between April 2008 and November 2024. We summarized the use of cholinesterase inhibitors, oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and intensive treatments (plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIg], or high-dose steroid pulse therapy) during the one-year follow-up period after the first confirmed MG diagnosis recorded in the database. We also compared patient characteristics and treatment patterns by age group (children: 0-9 years vs. adolescents: 10-17 years).

RESULTS: We identified 261 patients with juvenile generalized MG, including 125 children and 136 adolescents cases. Cholinesterase inhibitors were the most frequently used medication (69.3% [181/261]). Oral corticosteroids were commonly used (65.9% [172/261]), whereas immunosuppressant use was limited; only 89/261 (34.1%) received tacrolimus. Among the 217 patients with complete one-year follow-up data, 146 received corticosteroid. The mean daily corticosteroid dose, calculated as the annual cumulative corticosteroid dose divided by 365 days, was 8.7 mg/day (SD 7.1) (children: 6.2 mg/day [SD 4.1]; adolescents: 11.4 mg/day [SD 8.6]). Among 261 generalized MG patients, 52 (19.9%) received intensive treatments, with a higher proportion in adolescents than children (25.7% [35/136] vs. 13.6% [17/125]). IVIg was the most common intensive treatment (13.4% [35/261]), followed by steroid pulse therapy (10.3% [27/261]) and plasma exchange (3.8% [10/261]). Adolescent generalized MG had higher intensive care unit hospitalization rates than child generalized MG (8.8% [12/136] vs. 0.8% [1/125]), and all thymectomies occurred in adolescent patients (8.1% [11/136] vs. 0% [0/125]).

CONCLUSION: In Japanese real-world practice, about one in five children with generalized MG required intensive treatments, particularly among adolescents, while steroid-sparing immunosuppression was used in only one-third. These findings support close monitoring of adolescent generalized MG and highlight opportunities to optimize steroid-sparing management in juvenile generalized MG.

PMID:42812702 | PMC:PMC13621577 | DOI:10.3389/fneur.2026.1877931


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4281270 ... 1&v=2.20.1
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »