[Pubmed] Systematic Review of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6501
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Mac OS X Chrome

[Pubmed] Systematic Review of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy in Autoimmune Diseases

Message par RSS-Bot »


J Clin Rheumatol. 2026 May 27. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000002354. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to systematically summarize available clinical data on the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in autoimmune diseases (ADs).

METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using PubMed and other literature databases to identify publications on CAR-T therapy in ADs published since 2020. Eligible studies included single-case reports and case series from clinical trials, while studies involving duplicated patient populations were excluded in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Extractable patient-level data were analyzed for key clinical outcomes.

RESULTS: A total of 32 studies encompassing 124 patients with ADs who received CAR-T therapy were included. The primary diseases treated were systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and myasthenia gravis (MG), with smaller numbers of patients reported in other ADs. In SLE trials, 83% achieved clinical remission or low disease activity following CAR-T therapy, within the first few months following infusion. In MG trials, minimal symptom expression was achieved in 73%. CAR-T disappearance and B-cell reconstitution generally occurred within the first few months following infusion and were predominantly of a naïve phenotype. Mild cytokine release syndrome was the most common adverse event; serious adverse events were reported in 4.8% of patients without treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION: Preliminary clinical evidence suggests that CAR-T therapy is associated with meaningful clinical response in selected ADs. Larger studies with standardized outcome measures and longer follow-up are needed to better define its safety and efficacy.

PMID:42235055 | DOI:10.1097/RHU.0000000000002354


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4223505 ... 4&v=2.20.0
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »