Myasthenie.com

J Surg Res. 2023 Jan 16;285:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.019. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of subxiphoid and subcostal arch thoracoscopic resection (SR) and the median sternotomy (MS) for thymoma with myasthenia gravis (MG) via propensity-matched analysis.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 502 patients with thymoma and MG in Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University from December 2012 to December 2017. The patients were allocated to SR group (n = 424) and MS group (n = 78). Perioperative outcomes were compared between SR group and MS group by using propensity-matched analysis.

RESULTS: All SR and MS operations were accomplished successfully. Most postoperative outcomes between the two groups showed no significant difference such as remission of MG and postoperative complication (P > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between MS group and SR group in operation time [(116.3 ± 33.7) min versus (52.2 ± 31.3) min], intraoperative blood loss [(145.2 ± 26.7) mL versus (51.2 ± 10.3) mL], chest drainage duration (3.4 d versus 0 d), days of hospital-stay (5.2 d versus 2.7 d), patient satisfaction score (5.9 ± 2.3 versus 8.7 ± 1.2), the incidence of complications and pain scores, with all P values < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that subxiphoid and subcostal arch thoracoscopic resection is a less invasive procedure with good safety and feasibility as compared with median sternotomy for thymoma with myasthenia gravis.

PMID:36652769 | DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2022.12.019


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3665276 ... t6+86293ac