[Pubmed] Consistency of the results of neurophysiological examinations with clinical diagnosis formed by the referring p

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6511
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    unknown unknown

[Pubmed] Consistency of the results of neurophysiological examinations with clinical diagnosis formed by the referring p

Message par RSS-Bot »


Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2023 Mar;32(1):18-22. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2023.127234. Epub 2023 May 8.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Access to electroneurographic/electromyographic (ENG/EMG) examinations and the number of patients referred for electrodiagnostic (EDX) examination are increasing. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the initial clinical diagnosis made by outpatient medical care physicians who referred patients to the EMG laboratory.

METHODS: We analyzed referrals and EDX results of all patients who visited EMG laboratory of the Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology in Warsaw in 2021. Examinations were performed in accordance with the standards and norms adopted in our laboratory by EMG-certified neurologists, regarding the initial diagnosis stated by referring physicians.

RESULTS: A total of 454 EDX results from 412 patients were analyzed. Most of patients (54.6%) were referred with diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), followed by single nerves damage (18.7%), polyneuropathy (18.1%), tetany (7.0%), myasthenia gravis (1.3%) or myopathy (0.2%). The result of the ENG/EMG examination was: diagnosis confirmation (61.9%), a new clinically significant diagnosis or additional asymptomatic nerve damage (32.4%), and normal examination result (25.1%) of patients. Electrophysiological examination most often confirmed the referral diagnosis in patients with suspected CTS (75.4%), followed by single nerves damage (51.8%), polyneuropathy (48.8%), tetany (31.3%) and the least for myasthenia gravis and myopathy (0%).

CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed frequent inconsistency of the EDX results with the clinical diagnosis formed by the referring physician. A high percentage of normal test results was noted. Initial diagnosis and the scope of EDX examination should be determined by detailed interview and physical examination.

PMID:37287737 | PMC:PMC10243291 | DOI:10.5114/ppn.2023.127234


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3728773 ... t6+86293ac
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »