[Pubmed] Standardization of Myasthenia Gravis Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice. A Report of the MGFA Task Force

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6512
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Mac OS X iPhone

[Pubmed] Standardization of Myasthenia Gravis Outcome Measures in Clinical Practice. A Report of the MGFA Task Force

Message par RSS-Bot »


Muscle Nerve. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1002/mus.28417. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Myasthenia gravis (MG) specific outcome measures are being used in clinical trials to evaluate therapeutic effectiveness. These validated tools are also becoming a necessity in clinical practice, with payors in the US market often requiring them to be used to monitor disease state. There is considerable variation and subjectivity regarding their use. This study aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for the standardization of MG specific outcome measures in clinical practice.

METHODS: A panel of 10 US-based MG specialists developed consensus-based recommendations based on three rounds of formal voting using the UCLA-RAND appropriateness method after surveying myasthenia gravis clinicians and developing a focus group.

RESULTS: Twenty one expert consensus statements based on six themes were developed following clinician survey result review and focus group theme development. Some key recommendations include: the MGFA Clinical Classification assesses disease at that examination and should be updated at intervals of 3-6 months to reflect current clinical status. MGFA PIS represents the overall clinical judgment of the evaluator without the requirement for a defined change in scores on any outcome measure. Patient-reported items, such as MG-ADL and MGC, should be referenced to the previous 1 week to optimize recall. Additional recommendations include scoring outcome measures in the presence of co-morbidity, scoring specific physical exam findings, and clarification regarding the administration of outcome measures.

DISCUSSION: This method provided expert consensus-based recommendations for the use of MG-specific outcome measures and exam findings to help standardize how they are used in clinical practice.

PMID:40260547 | DOI:10.1002/mus.28417


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4026054 ... t9+e462414
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »