[Pubmed] Longitudinal treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis: An analysis from the prospective Dutch-Belgian patient re

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6507
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Android Chrome

[Pubmed] Longitudinal treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis: An analysis from the prospective Dutch-Belgian patient re

Message par RSS-Bot »


J Neuromuscul Dis. 2025 Dec 9:22143602251405924. doi: 10.1177/22143602251405924. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Understanding treatment patterns in myasthenia gravis (MG) is crucial for clinical practice. However, longitudinal data are limited.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide an overview of treatment patterns in different subgroups throughout the disease course.

METHODS: All adult patients with acetylcholine receptor (AChR), muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), or seronegative MG enrolled in the Dutch-Belgian myasthenia registry were included. AChR-MG patients were classified into early-onset (EOMG) (≤50 years) and late-onset (LOMG) (>50 years) MG. Mixed-effects regression was used to compare differences between the different subgroups.

RESULTS: A total of 506 patients were included (147 AChR EOMG, 265 AChR LOMG, 26 MuSK, and 94 seronegative MG patients). Data were available within a year of diagnosis for 84 patients. Most patients initially started treatment with pyridostigmine (93%; 78/84), followed by corticosteroids (52%; 44/84) and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil (30%; 25/84). After ten years, the use of pyridostigmine (65%; 54/83) and corticosteroid use (36%; 30/83) declined, whereas the use of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil increased (55%; 46/83). Seronegative patients received fewer treatments than AChR MG patients, independent of functional status and disease duration (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.84, p = 0.018), and were less likely to use corticosteroids (OR 0.15, 95% CI [0.05-0.41], p < 0.001). Patients with LOMG reported more frequently immunosuppressive use compared to patients with EOMG (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.16-19.02, p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis offers valuable insights into treatment patterns in different subgroups of patients with MG. A substantial proportion of patients continues to rely on corticosteroids, suggesting an ongoing need for alternative treatment options.

PMID:41364382 | DOI:10.1177/22143602251405924


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4136438 ... 22+67771e2
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »