[pubmed] Electrophysiological testing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients treated with subcuta

Verrouillé
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6500
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Android Chrome

[pubmed] Electrophysiological testing in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy patients treated with subcuta

Message par RSS-Bot »


Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Sep 14:S1388-2457(20)30469-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.001. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess electrophysiology parameters that can reflect patients' clinical status and show changes in nerve function with treatment, in a study of subcutaneous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

METHODS: Nerve conduction studies (latency, conduction velocity, conduction block and compound muscle action potential [CMAP] on upper limb median, ulnar, and lower limb peroneal motor nerves) were conducted in the placebo-controlled PATH (Polyneuropathy And Treatment with Hizentra) study of two doses of maintenance subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) IgPro20 in CIDP.

RESULTS: Averaged proximal latency substantially increased with placebo (+1.1 ms) indicating electrophysiologic deterioration but remained stable with IgPro20 (0.2 g/kg bodyweight [bw]: +0.1 ms; 0.4 g/kg bw: -0.1 ms). Distal latencies were also more prolonged with placebo versus IgPro20. Averaged motor nerve conduction velocity substantially decreased with placebo (-1.6 m/s) versus increasing in both IgPro20 groups (+0.2 m/s and +1.0 m/s, respectively). Conduction block and CMAP amplitudes did not change substantially.

CONCLUSION: These findings support the effectiveness of maintenance IgPro20, as nerve function changed in the direction of increasing nerve dysfunction with placebo but remained stable with ongoing IgPro20 therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE: Electrophysiology testing can support assessment of clinical status in CIDP to determine treatment efficacy.

PMID:33039291 | DOI:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.09.001


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3303929 ... 5&v=2.12.3
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Verrouillé

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »