[Pubmed] Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and myasthenic syndromes: a systematic review

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6515
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Android Android

[Pubmed] Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and myasthenic syndromes: a systematic review

Message par RSS-Bot »


Neuroepidemiology. 2024 Oct 9:1-24. doi: 10.1159/000539577. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: No systematic reviews were published in the last years investigating epidemiological data, involving Myasthenia Gravis (MG) and related myasthenic syndromes. The aim of this systematic review was to estimate the prevalence, incidence, and mortality of all MG types and myasthenic syndromes worldwide.

METHODS: All literature published up to February 2024 was retrieved by searching the databases "Medline", "Embase", "ISI Web of Science" and "CINAHL" using the following search terms: (epidemiolog* OR frequency OR prevalence OR incidence OR mortality) AND (myasth* OR "anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody" OR "AChR" OR "MuSK" OR "anti-muscle specific kinase antibody" OR "LRP4" OR "seronegative MG").

RESULTS: A total of 94 studies, performed between 1952 and 2022, were included. Prevalence of MG ranged from 20 to 475 cases per million, with a mean prevalence of 173.3 (95% CI: 129.7-215.5) cases per million and a median prevalence of 129.6 cases per million. Incidence rates ranged from 2.3 to 61.3 cases per million person-years, with a mean incidence of 15.7 (95% CI: 11.5-19.9) and a median of 13.3 cases. Mortality rates showed a mean of 1.4 (95% CI: 0.8-2.1) cases per million person-years. AChR-MG was the clinical subtype more frequent in terms of prevalence and incidence.

DISCUSSION: The prevalence and incidence of MG have significantly increased over the last years worldwide, probably due to the improvement of epidemiological methodologies and current advances in diagnosis. However, we observed a significant variation in frequencies of MG between and within countries because of methodological biases and complex heterogeneity of the disease characterized by several phenotypes and different clinical responses.

PMID:39380477 | DOI:10.1159/000539577


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3938047 ... t9+e462414
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »