[Pubmed] Characterizing Perinatal Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Myasthenia Gravis

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6507
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Android Chrome

[Pubmed] Characterizing Perinatal Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Myasthenia Gravis

Message par RSS-Bot »


Muscle Nerve. 2025 Dec 3. doi: 10.1002/mus.70090. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Studies on pregnancy in myasthenia gravis (MG) are limited by small sample sizes or examine a limited number of outcomes. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of perinatal and infant outcomes and characterize perinatal treatment patterns in MG.

METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) and two other United States health insurance claims databases. Pregnancies in females aged 18-49 years were identified and maternal and infant records were linked. MG was defined by ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient diagnoses within a 365-day period. The prevalence of six perinatal outcomes was calculated in the MG and total populations. Treatments were summarized by class.

RESULTS: In pregnancies from CCAE between 2000-2023, preeclampsia (10.7% vs. 7.1%), Cesarean section (42.9% vs. 36.7%), preterm birth (18.0% vs. 9.9%), and small for gestational age (4.3% vs. 1.7%) were more frequent among MG (n = 900) than the age-adjusted total population (n = 5,185,726). Lack of treatment for MG was common across the perinatal period: 54.3% were untreated in the 6 months preconception, 61.2% in pregnancy, and 57.8% in the 6 months postpartum. Of those taking acetylcholinesterase inhibitors or corticosteroids in pregnancy, 21.8% and 33.1% had not been taking them before pregnancy, respectively.

DISCUSSION: MG was associated with a greater prevalence of certain perinatal outcomes, occurring in both mother and infant. In parallel, though most patients did not receive treatment in pregnancy those who did showed variation over time, suggesting a potential need for this population.

PMID:41334672 | DOI:10.1002/mus.70090


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4133467 ... 22+67771e2
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »