[Pubmed] Methylprednisolone pulse versus docetaxel in recurrent thymoma with myasthenia gravis

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6507
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    unknown  GPTBot/1.3

[Pubmed] Methylprednisolone pulse versus docetaxel in recurrent thymoma with myasthenia gravis

Message par RSS-Bot »


Front Neurol. 2025 Dec 19;16:1615529. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1615529. eCollection 2025.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of methylprednisolone pulse versus docetaxel in treating recurrent thymoma with myasthenia gravis (MG).

METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label, retrospective study that included 90 patients with thymoma recurrence accompanied by MG, who were treated with either methylprednisolone pulse or docetaxel. Compared the improvement rate of the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-intervention Status (MGFA-PIS) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS), changes in acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AchR-AB), and alterations in thymoma after treatment. Adverse events were also recorded.

RESULTS: Both treatments significantly reduced QMGS and AchR-AB levels (p < 0.05). For MG, the overall effective rate (ORR1) was similar between groups (p > 0.05). However, the methylprednisolone group showed a higher objective response rate (ORR2) and disease control rate (DCR) for thymoma (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reaction incidence was 66.7% for the methylprednisolone group and 44.4% for the docetaxel group (p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION: Methylprednisolone is more effective against thymoma than docetaxel for recurrent thymoma with MG, but has greater side effects. Docetaxel has similar MG efficacy compared to methylprednisolone, and with fewer side effects. The choice of treatment should be based on the patient's specific clinical situation.

PMID:41487432 | PMC:PMC12757259 | DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1615529


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4148743 ... 22+67771e2
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »