[Pubmed] Developing a Quality Assurance Framework for Neuro-Ophthalmology Using a Multisite Data Registry

[RSS-Bot]

J Neuroophthalmol. 2023 Jul 20. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001943. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance (QA) in neuro-ophthalmology (NOPH) is often lacking. We aimed to assess the quality of referral assessment and time to consult for common neuro-ophthalmological conditions by implementing a quality-assurance registry, NODE (Neuro-ophthalmology Database), in a tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinic. Australian standardized triage categories, namely, P1 (consult ≤30 days), P2 (consult ≤30-60 days), and P3 (consult ≤60-90 days), were developed and validated for neuro-ophthalmological conditions.

METHODS: We collected data from NODE on 676 patients at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne and developed a consensus on the assignation of NOPH conditions to triage categories using a modified Delphi approach. A panel of 7 experienced neuro-ophthalmologists scored conditions and assignation to triage categories. Consensus was considered when ≥75% of the panel strongly agreed or agreed. We analyzed the mean days from referral to triage and from triage to the initial consultation and compared that with the developed triage category standard.

RESULTS: Most patients presenting to the service were female (64%). Common diagnoses were idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) (19%), optic neuropathy (ON) (14%), nonspecific headaches (11%), cranial nerve defects (CND) (8%), and papilledema (7%). Consensus on triage category assignment was reached after 2 rounds of scoring from expert panel members. The mean time from referral to triage was performed in

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3747115 ... t6+86293ac