[Pubmed] Diagnostic accuracy of voluntary and stimulated neuromuscular jitter studies in ocular myasthenia gravis

[RSS-Bot]

Muscle Nerve. 2024 Jul 13. doi: 10.1002/mus.28202. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: There is a lack of studies comparing the accuracy of neuromuscular jitter analysis during voluntary activation (v-jitter study) versus axonal stimulation (s-jitter study). The study aimed to compare these two techniques in the same population of patients with suspected ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG).

METHODS: Fourteen control subjects (mean age: 55.5 ± 15.2 years) and 34 patients with suspected OMG (mean age: 59 ± 13.9 years) were prospectively evaluated. Twenty spike pairs and 30 individual spikes were analyzed during v-jitter and s-jitter study, respectively. Two different criteria for abnormal individual jitter values were evaluated: ≥ or > than 10% values exceeding the upper normal limit.

RESULTS: OMG was diagnosed in 19 patients based on clinical and laboratory findings, without considering jitter measurements. In most patients, v-jitter and s-jitter analyses provided comparable results. The maximum sensitivity (89%) was achieved with s-jitter study using the ≥10% criterion, while the maximum specificity (93%) was found with v-jitter study using the >10% criterion.

DISCUSSION: Both v-jitter and s-jitter studies showed good to very good accuracy for the diagnosis of OMG, in the absence of any statistically significant difference. Therefore, the patient's cooperation level and examiner's experience should guide the choice of performing v-jitter or s-jitter analysis in patients with suspected OMG.

PMID:39001646 | DOI:10.1002/mus.28202


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3900164 ... t9+e462414