[Pubmed] Characterizing Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Use in Patients and Subgroups with Chronic Inflammatory Demyel

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6511
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Android Chrome

[Pubmed] Characterizing Treatment Patterns and Healthcare Use in Patients and Subgroups with Chronic Inflammatory Demyel

Message par RSS-Bot »


Neurol Ther. 2025 Nov 28. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00862-3. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system. While some patients with CIDP respond to standard-of-care treatments, a significant proportion remains refractory or has partial response. Evidence on the disease burden of this patient group is limited. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the demographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare resource use of patients with CIDP in the United States, focusing on those who switched therapies within 2 years of initiating first-line treatment (LOT1).

METHODS: Integrated data from the Optum® de-identified Market Clarity dataset were used to identify adults diagnosed with CIDP from 2008-2020.

RESULTS: The CIDP cohort included 1942 treated patients (54% male, 75% aged ≥ 50 years). LOT1 included immunoglobulins (43%), corticosteroids (32%), combination of immunoglobulins and corticosteroids (11%), immunosuppressants (10%), and plasma exchange (5%). Within 2 years, 31% patients switched to second-line treatment (LOT2). The median time to switch from LOT1 to LOT2 was 5.6 months. Within 2 years after initiating LOT1, 92% patients had outpatient visits and 40% were hospitalized. Patients who switched treatments had more healthcare visits than those who did not switch (45.3 vs. 35.3/year).

CONCLUSION: Approximately one-third of the patients switched to a new treatment within 2 years after starting treatment, which could be partly due to limited efficacy of therapies in LOT1. The decrease in treatment duration after LOT1 may suggest limited utility of subsequent therapies. Frequent treatment changes and increased healthcare encounters in this subgroup highlight significant unmet needs in CIDP.

PMID:41313584 | DOI:10.1007/s40120-025-00862-3


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4131358 ... 22+67771e2
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »