[Pubmed] Efgartigimod Versus Lymphoplasmapheresis as Preoperative Rapid Antibody-Clearing Therapies for Thymectomy in Ge

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6501
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    unknown unknown

[Pubmed] Efgartigimod Versus Lymphoplasmapheresis as Preoperative Rapid Antibody-Clearing Therapies for Thymectomy in Ge

Message par RSS-Bot »


CNS Neurosci Ther. 2026 Jun;32(6):e70993. doi: 10.1002/cns.70993.

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the real-world effectiveness, surgical and economic outcomes of preoperative rapid antibody clearance therapy (RACT: lymphoplasmapheresis (LPE), efgartigimod (EFG)) versus oral immunosuppressants (Oral IS) in generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients undergoing thymectomy.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 78 patients (36 Oral IS, 42 RACT: 25 LPE, 17 EFG).

PRIMARY OUTCOME: 3-month postoperative quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES: 1-month postoperative exacerbation rate, 3- and 6-month MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL), 6-month QMG, surgical outcomes (operative time, blood loss, postoperative myasthenic crisis (POMC)), perioperative costs (pre- and post-reimbursement). Propensity score overlap weighting balanced covariates. Sensitivity analyses used propensity matching; multiple imputation handled missing data.

RESULTS: After weighting, 3-month QMG scores showed no significant difference between RACT and Oral IS groups (mean difference (MD) -0.23, 95% CI: -2.99 to 2.54, p = 0.831) nor between the EFG and LPE subgroups (MD 1.15, 95% CI: -3.97 to 6.26, p = 0.567); similar for MG-ADL. All groups improved over time (p < 0.001). For EFG vs. LPE, 1-month exacerbation rate was 43.3% vs. 26.1% (p = 0.412). No significant between-group differences between EFG and LPE were found in 6-month QMG/MG-ADL scores and surgical outcomes. EFG had higher preoperative pre-reimbursement costs (MD 14,500 CNY, p = 0.026), but no cost differences remained after insurance. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness of the primary findings.

CONCLUSION: Preoperative RACT effectively reduced QMG in gMG patients, with no significant postoperative medium-term effectiveness and safety differences between RACT and Oral IS. Similarly, no significant differences in postoperative medium-term effectiveness, safety, or post-reimbursement costs were observed between EFG and LPE.

PMID:42322065 | DOI:10.1002/cns.70993


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4232206 ... 3&v=2.20.0
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »