[Pubmed] Treatment Preferences of Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Study

Intégration des publications parues sur PUBMED
Répondre
Avatar du membre

Auteur du sujet
RSS-Bot
Ami(e) de Diamant
Ami(e) de Diamant
Messages : 6501
Enregistré le : 31 mai 2020 09:57
6
Zodiaque :
Âge : 22
Contact :
    Linux Chrome

[Pubmed] Treatment Preferences of Patients With Myasthenia Gravis: A Qualitative Study

Message par RSS-Bot »


Muscle Nerve. 2026 Jun 30. doi: 10.1002/mus.70241. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The burden of myasthenia gravis (MG) is often underestimated, and studies usually focus on the symptom burden. However, treatment-related adverse events also contribute to patients' burdens and affect their treatment decisions. Understanding the treatment preferences of people with MG will help inform patients, clinicians, and policy makers. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the most relevant factors that people with MG consider when making treatment decisions.

METHODS: Fifteen patients with a wide range of MG severity participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were recorded and transcripts were analyzed using line-by-line open coding to generate themes. We used these themes to identify the most relevant treatment characteristics for people living with MG.

RESULTS: Four themes were identified: MG symptoms, treatment side effects, treatment delivery preferences, and treatment goals. Double vision was the most bothersome symptom for 40% of patients, and 33% reported weight gain as the most bothersome side effect of treatment. Most patients preferred treatments in the form of pills (67%). The most frequently reported treatment goals were returning to normal or "zero symptoms" (40%), discontinuation of prednisone (40%), and a preference to take fewer pills (33%).

DISCUSSION: Our results underscore the importance of tailoring treatments to meet patient needs and preferences, emphasizing key treatment goals such as prednisone reduction, a preference for oral medications, and symptom resolution. We will incorporate these themes into a discrete choice experiment to gain a deeper understanding of how people with MG make treatment decisions when considering potential benefits and adverse events.

PMID:42376934 | DOI:10.1002/mus.70241


Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4237693 ... 3&v=2.20.0
Si vous appréciez notre travail, merci de nous soutenir un petit don en cliquant ICI

Pour obtenir la traduction en français,
cliquez sur le bouton situé dans la barre des menus en haut de cette page 

Image


Pour les donateurs, si cet article vous intéresse, nous pouvons faire l’acquisition d'un tiré-à-part.
Merci d'en faire la demande sur [email protected]


Bonne lecture...
Répondre

Retourner vers « Echos de la recherche »